5/21/2023 0 Comments Nightwood book![]() That she herself never restored it to this version during her lifetime suggests she may well have been satisfied with the later editions. ![]() Barnes, for her part, was willing to do almost anything to get her poetic narrative into print. While Coleman, an early and steadfast advocate of a book rejected by countless publishers, was motivated by aesthetic concerns, Eliot feared the censor. ![]() Despite all the lists of emendations, textual notes, hyphenations, and historical collations, it's never very clear exactly what was taken out from Barnes's version by her friend Emily Coleman and her editor, T.S. Her apparatus-heavy edition, while definitive for scholars, will only confuse readers looking for a reliable text of what Barnes wrote. ![]() As the editor of this new version of Barnes's 1936 erotic classic avers, ``the story of Nightwood's composition and coming to print is an extraordinary story.'' Unfortunately, Plumb (English/Pennsylvania State) is not the one to tell it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |